"Defilement" Galina Tsareva
looked film Galina Tsareva "Defilement" (not cite a source, there is record was of poor quality, I think you google and find better).
Strong picture, well layed-out, logically built. We strongly recommend to look at everything.
Just me being an atheist, I advise all atheists read the Bible. After all, knowledge - force!
only thing that did not like - so it is clearly biased: "Everything is bad all bastards! Salvation in religion!"
, you say wrong?
But why, in this case, the author contrasts the notorious "seksprosvet" exclusively to Orthodox traditions, and not common meaning? According to the logic Tsareva (more accurately, picked up her characters, confirming its position), the school should not even touch the "shameful" problems, because the fact is the family, because only parents can deal with such intimate topics.
This is all true, but only in the ideal. The ideal model assumes that, indeed, 1), all families are complete, 2) All parents are literate and educated, and 3) all the kids trust their parents, and openly discuss with them any questions.
Needless to say, as an ideal model does not correspond to reality ...
It turns out that if the family does not give children a basic knowledge of anatomy, physiology, hygiene, psychology sexuality (again, easy!), we, the teachers simply can not remain indifferent. And doctors need to take into allies, and not blame everything on them too. Because they are NOT teachers.
Tsarev and its heroes in the film warps that some benefits to children, talking too much detail (or rather, that they do something tell). Moreover, with the children, allegedly trying to introduce false and frankly unscientific truth, for example, that condoms protect against pregnancy and venzabolevany that homosexuality - this is not a perversion, that masturbation is not harmful, etc. And, worst of all, the very mention of all this horror, in fact, permits children to engage in all sorts of lewdness. While we all have to make children before marriage - no, no!
turns back the idealism of some sort.
We somehow hard forget about the existence of the school of those children who already are sexually active, ALREADY masturbate, and already is interested only representatives of their sex. Of course, it would be nice to all this "evil" somewhere gone, gone, for example, and we would have started working with children spotless and clean. But this is unrealistic. So, will somehow come out of the situation.
That's exactly what you might say a high school student who has lived with a man? And if we know that this man she was not alone? And if you know exactly what it has done an abortion and was treated for gonorrhea? Expel her from school? Will be hard to ignore, considering that this it applies only to the family? Or still try to carry out preventive work with the class that is not going to the person, warn the others the possible consequences of early pregnancy, the first abortion, and to give at least some information about contraception?
... In the film, the priest is indignant, saying, in the questionnaires, which offered students is amazing shameless question - "Do you know where the clitoris?", and 4 different answers. "Excuse me, - was indignant priest - on this question is not every adult male answer!!! "
Alas, very sorry that this is true ...
It turns out that the film states: This is bad, it's even worse, it is generally awful, but how good it was, if anything it was not! That is rrrraz! and in one moment everything stopped - and teenage sex and masturbation, and same-sex love ...
But this does not happen. And something must be done. But while some do, others have criticized.
... I was like a conversation with one of the characters featured in the film. This man is terribly indignant as seksprosvet penetrated even in the textbooks of primary classes. "Imagine, it says, that the flower, too, have genitals! It's just a terrible one!!! "
In general, light and clean - a very relative concept. And for some they are reduced to dense ignorance and unwillingness to know anything. And also the fact that someone knew something.
0 comments:
Post a Comment